Review: Meteor Garden 1 & 2 (2001/2002 TV Series)

Thursday, June 30, 2011

After seeing the 2009 Korean version, then the 2005 Japanese version, I had to travel back to 2001to see the Taiwanese version. Save for laugh out loud outdated clothing, the Taiwanese version didn’t quite disappoint…


                                               “A Taiwanese twist on an Asian ‘urban legend’.”

The Rundown
Behind the name: Pun on Japanese saying, “dumplings before flowers”
Country: Taiwan, 2001& 2002
 Genre: Romantic Comedy, Drama
Broadcast by: Chinese Television System
Directors: Cai Yuexun, Chai Zhi Ping
                       CastBarbie Hsu as Shan Cai, Jerry Yan as Dao Ming Si, Vic Zhou as Hua Ze Lei, Vanness Wu as Mei Zuo, Ken Chu as Xi Men, Michelle Saram as Ye Sha. 
            Compare to: Boys Before Flowers, Meteor Garden, Hana Yori Dango
Hate it or Love it?  Love it.

Synopsis in a Sentence: Shancai is a stubborn college girl with a mind of her own; she’s trying to mind her business as she attends Ying De College, but her life gets mixed up with the elite… and there’s no turning back once you’re mixed up with them.
           
It’s now an urban legend, and it started with Meteor Garden, then Hana Yori Dango then Boys Over Flowers, and now the world can’t get enough of this Asian series…

On Writing: The Plot
Uniquely Taiwanese, with of all the renditions of Hana Yori Dango, this one had the most twists, the most freedom, and was the most untrue to the original story (See Hana Yori Dango). But the story is good. The twists are interesting enough, but the plot falls at some parts (some extremely unbelievable, unexplained parts). Apart from that, it’s got enough twists to keep you off course, and enough interest to keep you going.
(4/5)

On Acting: The Cast
Not bad. Not quite bad, save for some mismatched casting (might have been better if the cast was re-shuffled a little bit). For example, the difference between Ximen and Meizuo’s character is blurred, whereas in the Japanese and Korean versions, they are more clearly defined.
Another major complaint — in many situations, the actors did not quite OWN their characters — their mannerisms, clothing, and possible reactions, seemed mismatched.
But overall, relatively good actors:




Barbie Hsu as Shan Cai (董杉菜) She plays the Makino (Japanese) and Jan Di (Korean) in this series. Although she’s a bit feminine, she does play tough quite well. And overall, is quite interesting








Jerry Yan as Dao Ming Si (道明寺) He plays Doumyouji (Japanese) and Jun Pyo (Korean) in this series, and plays the stubborn, hot-headed leader of F4 quite well. No gorgeous arrogance in this case, but at least he doesn’t come off as a bit of a hooligan. His character here comes up as a tougher, i-don’t-care-that-I’m-rich character, but with a lot less flair. 







Vic Zhou as Hua Ze Lei (花澤類) Plays Rui in the Japanese version and Ji Hoo in the Korean version. And he plays it quite well. The peaceful, sleep-loving character seemed to come quite naturally.







Vanness Wu as Mei Zuo (美作) He plays Akira (Japanese) and Yi Jeong (Korean). Perhaps he’s supposed to play the “playboy” but he came off as a lot less ‘playful.’ His character is not very different from Ximen’s, so that’s a pitfall. Aside from his character, it seems this guy thinks he’s quite the catch of the season…






Ken Chu as Xi Men (西門) Soujiro (Japanese) and Woo Bin (Korean). Not particularly bad. Quite good, but doesn’t have much of a different character of his own when compared to Meizuo’s character: needs a hint of character differentiation.








Michelle Saram as Ye Sha. She’s is a nice addition in Meteor Garden 2. She plays her character really well — arguably the best out of all of them in the second series.

(3.5/5)






On Production: The Creativity
Quite good, but the affluence of the characters was grossly understated: the characters simply seemed rich, whereas compared to the other versions, it was clear the characters were immensely rich. You don’t quite get the hang of  total financial worth of F4 in this series, and that’s a major pitfall.
Other than that, production wasn’t too bad
I have to add one thing about fashion here… my gosh. How honestly HORRIFIC! Seriously ugly pieces of clothing, particularly the males… (Take note, Meizuo’s character). I know that it’s supposed to be 2001, but aren’t these characters rich? How did the producer’s completely miss that? It’s like mistaking cheap cotton is for pure silk: not cool!

(3/5)                                             


On Resolution: The Conclusion
Quite a good ending. Over all, the series was completely resolved. It’s a fun watch, with great twists and interesting developments. Uniquely Taiwanese?
(4/5)

The Verdict: Good Good Good, especially for the first version of the series!

Overall Score = 15 /20



Watch Meteor Garden [http://www.mysoju.com/meteor-garden]



Days and Clouds (2007 Film)

Monday, June 13, 2011

The best things in life are free… if only we can learn to live without.


“’Days and Clouds’ maintains the realistic dynamics between money, marriage and love with sophisticated candour.”

The Rundown
Behind the name: Also Known As “Giorni e' Nuvole”
Country: Italy & Switzerland, 2007
 Genre: Drama
Distributed by: Amka Films Producations & The Film Movement
Director: Silvio Soldini
Cast: Margherita Buy (as Elsa), Antonio Albanese (as Michele), Giuseppe Battiston (as Vito), Alba Rohrwacher (as Alice), Carla Signoris (as Nadia) and Fabio Troiano (as Riki)
Compare to: Time Out
Hate it or Love it?  Like it, for what its worth…  

Synopsis in a Sentence: An otherwise wealthy couple is forced to face real life after the man of the house loses his job, and they find that it’s a bit harder to be in love when money’s out of the equation.

On Writing: The Plot
It’s a story very few movies take on nowadays, and the plot deserves the careful countenance the film addresses. It’s interesting to see the dynamics of family relationships when under strain: The plot carries the nuances of the matter and highlights them through the characters. It’ not a film that preaches, neither is it one that simply narrates. It instead invites you into the time and space of the characters, harnessing both objectives in proper fashion.
 (3.5/5)

On Acting: The Cast
It’s a good sign when you’re watching a film and forget about the acting—it means the characters are so believable they con you into forgetting that they are acting. I do not recall remembering any “actors” throughout this film. On another note, perhaps it’s not a good thing, as good actors are remembered for their great skill. However, their performances were independently good, yet collectively complementing.
(3.5/5)

On Production:
Nice, warm hues, the camera complemented the story, taking angles and perspectives that went in line with the plot. Well done.
 (3.5/5)                                             

On Resolution: The Conclusion
It doesn’t end in the manner we quite would expect, which is what I would label a good film, a really good film. It’s a faux pas for a film to be predictable, and too many films continuously commit this crime in modern cinema, but this one doesn’t.
(4/5)

The Verdict: A realistic perspective on marriage, not overly pessimistic, yet not idealistically over-optimistic. Days and Clouds maintains the dynamics between money, marriage and love with sophisticated candor.

Overall Score = 14.5/20