Showing posts with label French. Show all posts
Showing posts with label French. Show all posts

Persepolis (2007 Film)

Monday, January 31, 2011

I intended to see Persepolis a long time ago, but things kept getting in the way, but I’m glad I waited though, it was a breath of fresh air after all my experiences in Foreign films.  



“A graphic novelist’s  first-attempt at film puts experienced directors to shame.”


The Rundown

Behind the name: Reference to the old city of Persepolis, Persia, capital of The Achaemenid Empire (ca. 550–330 BC)
Country: France, 2007
 Genre: Animated Drama
Distributed by: 2.4.7 Films, France
                       Cast: Chiara Mastroianni (as teenage and adult Marjane), Catherine Deneuve (as Mother), Danielle Darrieux (as Grandmother), Simon Abkarian (as Father)
Compare to: Itself
Hate it or Love it?  Love it.   

Synopsis in a Sentence: Follow the life of a girl who grew up during the Iranian Revolution, experienced what life in Iran was before the that time, after that time, and all the difference a little history makes.  
           

Persepolis started with a budget slightly over $7 million dollars that grossed US$22,752,488 for its makers. It’s been a subject of censorship for middle-eastern, Asian, and even western authorities alike, and spawned the 2007 Cannes film Festival Jury Prize, amongst 15 other awards and nominations, including best feature at the 80th Grammy Awards.
            You know a film has made it big when it’s up for awards and censorship simultaneously. 


On Writing: The Plot

Animated war dramas. There aren’t many of them around. The method of storytelling is unique because relative to the use of human characters, it may present the ideas in a lightly detached mode. However, Persepolis did not make that mistake. The story is delivered in a way that brings human characters to life in an enveloped, comical manner that might have flopped if delivered by the use of human actors.
The plot is not one we hear of everyday. We often hear of the plight of the poor, or the affluence of the wealthy, seldom are we shown the struggles of the “comfortable” if we can put it that way. It’s not only about the depression of war, or the loss of freedom, or the tragedy of love, or the search for oneself in the face of catastrophe. It’s all of these, wrapped up in one impressive plot.
 (4.5/5)


On Acting: The Cast

Ha!
Should we assess animated actors? Of course!
The characters themselves were interesting. Most of the characters, being round characters exhumed more character than humans I know. They were unapologetic, straightforward, authentic and empathic. A great achievement for sketched people, don’t you think?
 (4/5)


On Production:

Don’t turn your brain off just because the film is animated. Its definitely not a Disney production, nor is it anime. It is, in every way, a film, only just animated.
Its animated method of production allowed it to pull off more than it clould have in “real life.” And for good reason too. Its artistically infused comedic pieces flowed seamlessly with the true-to life drama. Production-wize, Presepolis is indeed a breath of fresh air to worldwide cinema. 
 (4/5)                                              


On Resolution: The Conclusion

Originally an autobiography, Persepolis jumped into the world of film with little experience and managed… no, succeeded in succeeding. The fact that the self-authour is still alive allows the story go on, even after the film ends. That’s quite interesting to know. Now before I sign out, I must say, self author, Marjane Satrapi, must be proud of herself for turning her autobiographic novels into an oscar-nominated hit. I plan to do that one day.
That said, you already know how the story ends, further than the film takes us. The resolution is unique.
(4/5)

The Verdict: A great piece of work: Authentic, fresh and entertaining, despite its dramatic and tragic base. An excellent blend of genres.

Overall Score = 16.5/20


 



La Nuite de la Vérité (2004 Film)

Sunday, October 31, 2010

I picked this one up because I’d never seen (or heard) any kind of entertainment form Burkina Faso. It turned out that this film had more truth and less entertainment than I was ready for.  


“War opens our souls—and once the soul is open, demonscomes in.” –Commandant Moussa Cissé in La Nuit de la Vérité.

The Rundown

Behind the name: Direct Translation—The Night of Truth. All the action takes place in one night
Country: Burkina Faso/France, 2004
 Genre: Historical Drama
Distributed by: The Global Film Initiative
Director: Fanta Régina Nacro
Cast: Naky Sy Savane (as Edna), Commandant Moussa Cissé (as Theo), Georgette Paré (Soumari), Amada Ouédraougo, Rasmané Ouédraougo, Sami Rama Goumbane (as Fatou), Capitaine Yves Thombiano (N’Gove), Capitaine Claude Kabore (as Youba), Odilia Yoni ( as Awa), Cedric Zida (As Honore), Raissa Andréa Yoni, Adama Ouédraougo (as Léonard), Troupe Naba Yaadéga (as the dancers), Serge Henry (as the driver).
Compare to: Hotel Rwanda
Hate it or Love it?  Appreciate it.

Synopsis in a Sentence: Two ethnic groups in an un-named country
 at war search for peace in one night but, in the process, old wounds are open, leaving new scars for hatred.
           
The truth is hard to swallow. This film was hard to put down. It’s raw, rough, and grimy. It unveils the disgusting accounts of war, genocide and hatred, and the worst part of it is that these tales are indeed true, and once happened.

On Writing: The Plot

The story itself is not bad. Nowhere near bad. But what it tells about is gruesome, disgusting and even repelling. The writing itself is very good, unveiling the topics of ethnic profiling, forgiveness, hated, murder, peace, suspicion, and in its own unique way, love. The plot allows us remember what we forgot, what once lied in the hearts of countrymen as they fought against oppression for their freedom. Mais, c’est très tragique. Which makes it good. What makes the writing is that it is real, so real that you may not even want to be told the story. It ends well, and although this is nasty work, it is very well done!

 (4/5)


On Acting: The Cast

Real. After seeing them in this picture I doubt that they are not the same as their characters. It feels all true, all real. In fact, I’m convinced that some of them were playing themselves on-screen. And I’m not joking.

(4/5)


On Production: The Creativity

Think of this as a very creative fictitious documentary. The production was factual. In a few scenes, the camera allowed a point-of-view perspective, drawing in its audience, convincing us that we were there at that time. When necessary, the camera allowed for ample implications, trusting in its audience’s intelligent to work out the irony of the shots. And must I add that the production was real. Forget fantasy horror flicks that flaunt fiction in our faces. The picture this film paints is unapologetically grimy, characteristically gruesome, and yet tragically true. Kudos to Africa’s leading Female director, Fanta Régina Nacro.
 The production was good. 

(4/5)                                              


On Resolution: The Conclusion

Before I get to the conclusion, I must state that I did not at all enjoy this film. It left with me a morbid, revolting, un-entertaining aftertaste. (In all manners possible—literally, I was revolted by the sight of food after this). That said, the film embodied the art of resolution with a Macbeth-meets-Romeo-and-Juliet-like artistry to its conclusion. I couldn’t have recommended a better conclusion.
It was artfully, artfully done.

(4/5)


The Verdict: It’s hard to take down, but after gulping gallons of over-sweetened film productions (sugar-coated realities), it may be worth pushing this down.
For your own good.  

Overall Score = 16/20 



I didn’t particularly enjoy it, but it had a lot of truth to it. Find out the truth for yourself. See La Nuit de la Verite. Watch an Interview with the director [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tHyrZjM0vSQ]

La Fleur Du Mal (2003 Film)

Monday, July 19, 2010

Think of this as a dark comedic-drama.
It’s a complex build-up of familial issues. Ponder on good and evil, morality, incest, murder, circumstantial ties, ambition, hatred, and love—both erotic and phileo.



“The stark realism and dry humour employed in La Fleur du Mal reminds us why dysfunctional families are not much fun.”


The Rundown
Behind the name: Translation—The Flower of Evil
Country: France, 2003
 Genre: Psychological Drama
Distributed by: Lionsgate & Palm Pictures
Directors: Claude Charbol
                   Cast: Benoît Magimel (as François Vasseur), Nathalie Baye (as Anne Charpin-Vasseur), Mélanie Doutey (as Michèle Charpin-Vasseur), Suzanne Flon (as Tante Line), Bernard Le Coq (as Gérard Vasseur), Thomas Chabrol (as Matthieu Lartigue), Henri Attal (as le beau-père de Fanny), Françoise Bertin (as Thérèse), Caroline Baehr (as Fanny), Didier Bénureau (as Brissot)
                   Compare to: American Dream
Hate it or Love it?  Ponder on the subject a bit

Synopsis in a Sentence: A young French man comes back from America to re-encounter the familial disarray he ran away from, and just as things take shape, deep, dark secrets are uncovered.

In these days that television glorifies dysfunctional families and broken relationships, La Fleur du Mal brings the sorrow and emptiness of the situation into light, and we realise, there’s nothing really entertaining about dysfunctional relationships.


On Writing: The Plot

It’s a story on bleak relationships, mistrust, honesty and love. It’s quite a mix of emotions carried by a motley selection of characters. Some you can trust, some you cannot. The writing makes no excuses for the actions of the characters. Neither does it hide their true nature. The plot tells the story of a complex family brought together by circumstance, wealth, and fate—If you will call it that. The younger characters are caught in the lives of the older ones while re-living the mistakes of their parents (and their parent’s parents), while the parents, trapped in these mistakes, pre-occupy themselves with anything but the truth of the matter. Put together, the family becomes a network of detestation, despondency and discontentment forced to associate in the name of blood. What makes the story complex is the fair bit of “love” spread across a few of the characters, and in the end we learn that although love bears all things, it should not bear all.

 (3.5/5)


On Acting: The Cast

The actors were good. Suzanne Flon’s portrayal of the sinful saint brings you to reason with her character’s flaw. We may call her the heroine of the cast. Nathalie Baye portrays the ambitious woman/the trying wife, and does so true to form. Bernard de Coq typifies the detestable male worth detesting, and Mélanie Doutey is all sugar and spice.
Their acting is stark, simple, and straightforward, which gives the film a realistic feel. A vital skill employed in psychological dramas such as these.

(3.5/5)


On Production:
Like the acting, stark, straightforward, clean, and to-the-point, with a few tweaks to highlight the mood of the scenes. But it’s no wrong done for this genre of film.

(3.5/5)                                             


On Resolution: The Conclusion

If you’ve ever seen a Claude Chabrol film, you may be accustomed to the same topics. True to form, the theme, which highlights the “bad bourgeoisie” is employed here again. Chabrol employs minimal political satire to assail the middle-class again. But he’s mastered his subject, and the resolution to La Fleur du Mal does not disappoint. He even manages to inject a dose of humour to the dark, dark climax. Not many films end in this manner and once again, it’s worth experiencing the stab of the final rolls of film, or DVD laser readings, in this case.

 (4/5)


The Verdict: If you’re in the mood for realism, morbid humour and pleasant villains, see this one.

Overall Score = 14.5/20

Get La Fleur du Mal here